 |
 Stanley K. Schultz, Professor of History William P. Tishler, Producer Lecture 10
How Ya' Gonna' Keep 'Em Down on the Farm?: The Rise of Populism
Beginning in the 1870s, worsening conditions in rural America caused
many people to abandon their farms. At the same time, changes in
farming practices and the agricultural marketplace made farmers more dependent
on commercial decisions made by big-city businessmen. In reaction to these
trends, farmers began to take political action that led to the emergence of the
national Populist movement in the 1890s. This lecture investigates
changing agricultural conditions in the United States during the nineteenth
century and explores how many rural Americans mobilized to deal with their
crushing economic and political problems.

Some questions to keep in mind:
- How did agriculture change in the United States between 1870 and 1900?
- How did farmers try and protect their economic interests and way of
life during this period? Were they successful? Why or why not?
- Who were the Populists? Why were they so appealing to farmers?
Did they change American politics? If so, how?

Changes in Agriculture
1. Mechanization of agriculture
The mechanization of agriculture led to huge improvements in efficiency, but caused problems for the yeoman (independent) farmer.
Problems Presented by Machines
- More capital needed
- Machines demanded upkeep and repair
- Added to the financial risks that independent farmers had to take
|


| Mechanization of agriculture | Copyright 1997 State Historical Society of Wisconsin
|
|


| The "Little Giant" thresher, like other farm machinery, reduces farm labor needs, but increases capital costs | Copyright 1997 State Historical Society of Wisconsin
|
2. Opening of new agricultural lands
As land prices went up and crop prices fell, farmers began mortgaging their
property in order to put more land in cultivation. Unusually high
levels of rainfall also fueled a drive for land acquisition during
the 1870s and the early 1880s. By cultivating more land, farmers
hoped to pay off their growing debts. Many urban businessmen, however, charged farmers extraordinarily
high interest rates on their mortgages. When drought struck the Midwest in 1886, the
combination of unwatered crops and high interest rates was disastrous for many farmers. By
the mid-1880s, Midwestern farmers had the highest per capita debt in the United States. |


| Wisconsin threshing scene, September | Copyright 1997 State Historical Society of Wisconsin
|
|
3. Growth of specialization in farm products
Although American farmers experimented with new plants and
methods on a regular basis throughout the nineteenth century, most
preferred to grow familiar crops. As a result, while urban businessmen were
diversifying their holdings, farmers continued to invest all of their
capital in a single crop and increased their chances of sliding into
financial ruin.
4. Changing character of markets for agricultural goods
Prior to the Civil War, only a handful of American farmers sold their crops abroad.
After the War, however, international markets for United States agricultural goods expanded
dramatically. In the years from 1860 to 1900, agricultural products comprised 75% of the
United States' total export trade.
Many farmers, however, did not understand fully the financial complexities of commodity markets
or foreign
trade. Middlemen, especially railroad agents and owners, profited from the ignorance of
the farmers. Thus, even as markets for farm products expanded, farmers
often did not benefit from that expansion.. |


| Loading a grain steamer at Milwaukee--linking Midwestern farmers with the world economy | Copyright 1997 State Historical Society of Wisconsin
|
|

Farmers remained
largely ignorant of basic business practices after the Civil War. They had none of the power that had made other
businessmen prosperous. Farmers had no control over the marketplace. Their prosperity,
in fact,
depended on six factors which they could not regulate:
- Business Cycles
- Credit
- Transportation
- Labor Supply
- Price Structure
- Government policies
In reaction to these problems, farmers began to take political action.

"Agrarian Myth"
This is the concept, popularized by Thomas Jefferson, that the
self-reliant yeoman farmer was the bedrock of American society. The gulf between this ideal and the reality
of farming--falling income, and loss of profits to the railroads, exasperated farmers.
For this reason, many tried to form organizations that would make the
Agrarian myth a reality at the end of the nineteenth century.
The Grange
The full name of the Grange was "The National Grange of the Patrons
of Husbandry." The word "grange" comes from an archaic word for
"granary," but, in the context of American history, the word refers to an association of
farmers founded in the United States in 1867. The Grange worked to pass pro-farmer legislation and
instituted the cooperative movement to allow farmers to pool capital and
purchase machinery, supplies, and insurance.
"At first most of the [Granges] were in Minnesota, the home of the
founder, Oliver Kelley. During the 1870s, however, the movement spread rapidly, fed by
agrarian desperation over hard times, high railroad shipping rates, and tight money. By
1875, the membership had passed 850,000. During these years, the Grangers placed growing
emphasis on the extent to which farmers were being victimized by railroads, merchants, and
banks. The Patrons of Husbandry stood at the head of a nationwide agrarian movement[...]
that created hundreds of cooperatives, founded banks, pushed through legislation
regulating railroads and grain elevators, and campaigned for political candidates.[...]
Because of opposition from local businesses as well as the Grangers' own inexperience, few
of their economic initiatives succeeded. Nevertheless, they set important precedents with
their legislation, particularly those regulating railroads (as affirmed by the Supreme
Court in Munn v. Illinois, 1877). More important, the Granger movement marked the
beginning of an aggressive and self-conscious effort by the nation's farmers to define
their problems in economic terms and to address those problems through economic and
political action." Eric Foner and John A. Garraty, eds.,
The Reader's Companion to American History (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1991) 464-65.
Munn vs. Illinois
The United States Supreme Court decided
Munn vs. Illinois
in
1877. In its ruling, the court upheld the right of state legislatures to regulate
railroad rates.
"Chief Justice Morrison R. Waite wrote the majority opinion. In it he
stated that private property becomes subject to regulation by the government through its
'police powers' when the property is devoted to the public interest" Eric Foner and John A. Garraty, eds., The Reader's Companion to
American History (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1991) 759.
"Common carriers exercise a sort of public office,
and have duties to perform in which the public is interested.... Their business is,
therefore, 'affected with a public interest.'"-- (From the majority opinion of
Chief Justice Waite.)

After this legal victory, the Grange backed away from political activism.
In addition, improved agricultural conditions in the Midwest caused membership to drop.
Three new organizations eventually succeeded the Grange in the 1880s.
- Farmers and Laborers' Union of America was a regional association in
the Southwest. By 1890, it had 3 million members.
- Northwest Farmers' Alliance began in Chicago and spread throughout the
Midwest. By 1890, it had 2 million members.
- Colored Farmers National Alliance addressed the needs of
African-American farmers in
the South and in the Midwest. By 1890, it had between 1 and 1.5 million members.
|


| The last meeting of the First Farmers Alliance at their First House | Copyright 1997 State Historical Society of Wisconsin
|
|
These three groups held a convention in St. Louis, Missouri, in 1889, but
they were unable to overcome regional differences and form a national
organization. In the
elections of 1890, however, southern farmers allied with local Democrats, while Midwestern farmers
formed their own local parties which became known as "People's Parties." Mary Elizabeth Lease, a Kansas farmwoman, was one of the Populist orators who traveled
throughout rural America trying to whip up support for pro-farm candidates in the election
of 1890.
Omaha Platform of 1892
In 1890, farmers elected 5 United States senators, 6 governors, and 46 congressmen. Encouraged by
this electoral success, farmers again set their sights on a national coalition. The three major farmers'
organizations held a convention in Omaha, Nebraska, in 1892. Six principal
demands emerged from this meeting:
- A permanent union of all working classes
- Wealth for the workers
- Government ownership of railroads
- Government ownership of all communications systems
- More flexible and fair distribution of the national currency
- No more ownership of land by those who do not actually use it
As it turned out, the Populists' less radical demands,
such as their call for a secret ballot, a graduated income
tax, and the direct election of Senators, became law within
twenty years.

Main critiques made by Populists:
- The American legal system placed too much emphasis on property rights
- Monopolies were an economic and social evil
- Social Darwinism & laissez-faire
were bankrupt ideologies
- Industrial society had turned individuals into economic commodities
- Wealth was unevenly distributed



| William Jennings Bryan (1860-1925), Populist leader | Copyright 1997 State Historical Society of Wisconsin
|
Populism and Presidential Elections
William Jennings Bryan was nominated for president by both the Democrats and the Populists
in 1896. At the 1896 Democratic national convention, Bryan
delivered the "Cross of
Gold" speech, which called for unlimited coinage of silver.
He held that government should protect individuals and the democratic
process against the growing power of monopolies. Bryan lost to the Republican candidate, William McKinley, who
ran on a platform of "prosperity for all." In 1900, Bryan ran again for
president and hoped to make the election a referendum on American imperialism, but lost to McKinley a
second time. His final campaign for president was in 1908, when he lost to William Howard
Taft. |


| William Jennings Bryan (1860-1925), Populist leader | Copyright 1997 State Historical Society of Wisconsin
|
|


| William McKinley (1843-1901) | Copyright 1997 State Historical Society of Wisconsin
|
|
William McKinley
(1843-1901) |
© 1997 State Historical Society of Wisconsin |
Tom Watson was the Populist candidate for president in
1904 and 1908. Watson was vehemently anti-Semitic, anti-Black, and
anti-immigrant, and his failed campaign demonstrated the collapse of
Populism as a national political movement.

Rural America underwent massive transformations in the
late-nineteenth century. In response, farmers began a nationwide movement demanding a new kind
of politics. More and more people began to view the federal government as a possible
source of protection against the ravages of industrial society. Farmers,
however, were not the only Americans who championed government power as
a means to assuage the problems that they perceived in society. As conditions
in cities worsened in the late-nineteenth century, more and more city dwellers began to make
similar calls for government action. The story of this urban counterpart to Populism is an
incredibly fascinating and important subject; so important, in fact, that it is the
subject of the next lecture: Lecture #11, "The Dawn of
Liberalism: the Story of Progressivism."
Home || Course || Guide || Bios || Photos || Exams ||
Calendar || Comments/Sign-in
© 1999 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System |