|
|
|
||||
|
|
||||||
The concept of the Great American Desert had long been familiar to Americans and indeed it controlled much of the directions of the growth of the nation for a major part of the nineteenth century. So we have to dip back a little bit before the Civil War to see how this geographical concept, this geographical myth, came into being, and how it influenced the growth, the thoughts, the attitudes, of the American people as they moved westward.
Consequently, there was very sparse settlement in the area beyond the Mississippi River in the 1840s and the 1850s--isolated pioneer homesteads here and there, but not settlers pouring in vast numbers until the late 1850s and the early years of the 1860s. In the years immediately following the end of the Civil War, traffic into the trans-Mississippi West picked up dramatically by the hundreds, then by the thousands, then by the hundreds of thousands. Settlers poured into the Great Plains moving westward. As the population increased in the Great Plains trans Mississippi West area, many people came to recognize that the old myth of the Great American Desert was no longer true. If indeed it had been true, they needed a way to combat the myth. People eager on boosting settlement and attracting business and getting railroad connections wanted the rest of the nation to believe that the so called Great American Desert was not a desert at all. So they built a counter myth. Now they began to call the Great Plains in the late 1860s and the 1870s "The Garden," the Garden of the West, an agricultural paradise in which there was space enough, and time enough for people to achieve their wildest dreams. A new kind of booster literature appeared portraying the entire Great American Desert area, the entire Great Plains area as an agrarian heaven, an idyllic spot.
One of the characteristics of the area that we're talking about here, particularly the Great American Desert, is a lack of abundant rainfall. But men, eager to see the area grow, eager to lure new settlers, convinced themselves and tried to convince others that the Great Plains had a more than abundant rainfall. To sell the myth of the Garden, people began selling the myth exemplified in the phrase popular in the 1870s, that "rain follows the plow." Wherever the yeoman farmer took up the land, broke the land and planted his crops, heaven was bound to yield the appropriate rainfall to grow those crops. How did people begin to believe this myth? Discussion of the myth and selling the notion to the public came from a number of scientists, one of whom an amateur scientist was named Charles Dana Wilber. And of most of the boosters of the West, this man was probably the most significant in the 1870s and the 1880s. Wilber's claim was that he could prove scientifically that rainfall was bound to increase as the farming frontier moved westward. In his highly influential book, The Great Valleys and Prairies of Nebraska and the Northwest, published in 1881, Wilber wrote that the ages old symbol of the yeoman farmer, the plow, was the instrument of cooperation between God, nature, and man. Wilber wrote this: "In this miracle of progress, the plow was the unerring prophet, the procuring cause, not by any magic or enchantment, not by incantations or offerings, but instead by the sweat of his face toiling with his hands, man can persuade the heavens to yield their treasures of dew and rain upon the land he has chosen for his dwelling." And Wilber concluded: "The raindrop never fails to fall and answer to the imploring power or prayer of labor." |
||||||